Back to Blog
Research

What Is a Good Engagement Rate on YouTube in 2026? (Based on 75,000 Channels)

April 9, 2026
7 min read
S
By SociaVault Team
YouTubeEngagement RateBenchmarksResearchYouTube ShortsSociaVault Labs

What Is a Good Engagement Rate on YouTube in 2026?

The median engagement rate on YouTube is 3.06% — the second-highest of any major platform.

But YouTube measures engagement differently than other platforms. The denominator is views, not subscribers. This matters enormously. A video with 10,000 views and 300 likes + comments has a 3% engagement rate regardless of whether the channel has 1,000 or 1,000,000 subscribers. YouTube's algorithm drives most traffic, so views are a more meaningful baseline than audience size.

These benchmarks come from SociaVault Labs' analysis of 75,000 YouTube channels, filtered for authentic accounts as part of our 350,000+ account cross-platform study.


YouTube Engagement Rate Formula

YouTube ER = (Likes + Comments) / Views × 100

We use views as the denominator because YouTube is discovery-first. Most views come from recommendations, search, and Shorts feed — not the subscriber inbox. A subscriber-based formula would produce wildly inflated numbers for channels whose videos regularly outperform their subscriber count (which is most channels).


YouTube Engagement by Subscriber Tier

TierSubscribersMedian ER25th Pctl75th Pctl
Nano1K–10K5.23%3.41%7.82%
Micro10K–50K3.74%2.48%5.43%
Mid50K–100K2.81%1.87%4.12%
Macro100K–500K2.12%1.38%3.24%
Mega500K+1.41%0.89%2.18%

What the tiers tell you

Nano channels (1K–10K) get the most engagement per view at 5.23%. Small channels tend to have dedicated audiences — people who searched for specific content and found it. These viewers are high-intent. They watch, they like, they comment.

The nano-to-mega drop is 3.7×. A mega channel gets roughly a quarter of the engagement per view compared to a nano channel. This is less steep than TikTok (4.3×) and much less than LinkedIn (5.0×), because YouTube's view-based formula partially corrects for audience size already.

Macro channels (100K–500K) at 2.12% is the tier most brands work with. If you're running sponsorships with macro YouTube creators, 2.12% is your realistic benchmark — not 3 or 4%.


Shorts vs. Long-Form: The 1.4× Gap

YouTube Shorts changed the equation in 2025–2026:

FormatMedian ERRelative
YouTube Shorts~3.8%1.4× higher
Long-form video~2.7%Baseline

Shorts get 1.4× more engagement per view than long-form content. The behavior is different — Shorts viewers swipe through quickly, double-tap likes more casually, and comment in shorter bursts. Long-form viewers are more passive (watch but don't click).

For creators, this means Shorts will inflate your overall engagement rate. If you're benchmarking, break your analytics into Shorts vs. long-form and compare each against the right baseline.

For brands, Shorts sponsorships deliver higher engagement rates but shorter attention spans. Long-form integrations deliver lower ER but deeper brand exposure. They're different products.


YouTube Engagement by Content Niche

RankNicheMedian ER
1Education & How-to4.62%
2Gaming4.18%
3Technology Reviews3.94%
4Fitness & Health3.42%
5Food & Cooking3.28%
6Entertainment & Comedy3.12%
7Parenting & Family2.87%
8Finance & Business2.64%
9Travel & Lifestyle2.42%
10News & Commentary2.31%
11Vlogs & Lifestyle2.14%
12Music1.87%

Education and gaming dominate YouTube engagement — for opposite reasons. Education content generates comments (questions, corrections, alternative methods). Gaming content generates community interaction (viewer challenges, build suggestions, live reactions).

Music sits at the bottom at 1.87%. Music videos get massive view counts but most viewers are listening, not engaging. People play a song on repeat; they don't like it 5 times. High views, low interaction.

Technology reviews at 3.94% are a YouTube-specific standout. Detailed product comparisons drive comment sections full of "I went with the X instead" and "You missed the Y feature" — substantive engagement that the algorithm rewards.


Year-over-Year: YouTube Is Growing

YearMedian ERChange
20242.84%
20252.96%+4.2%
20263.06%+3.4%

YouTube is one of only three platforms where engagement is increasing year-over-year. The driver is Shorts — the format brought TikTok-style casual engagement behavior to YouTube's massive user base.

Two consecutive years of growth while most other platforms are declining. For brands reallocating budgets away from platforms with falling engagement, YouTube is a strong candidate.


What Makes YouTube Different

A few things to keep in mind when comparing YouTube engagement to other platforms:

View-based ER is lower by nature. Because the denominator is views (not followers), YouTube percentages look lower than platforms where you divide by follower count. A 3% YouTube ER is excellent. A 3% TikTok ER (where the denominator is followers) means something completely different.

Long shelf life. YouTube videos accumulate engagement for months or years. A blog-style tutorial can generate comments two years after publishing. This means engagement rates on older content can increase over time — unlike any other platform where content dies within 48 hours.

Comment quality is higher. YouTube comments tend to be longer, more substantive, and more discussion-oriented than other platforms. For brands, this means YouTube engagement signals real attention, not casual thumb-scrolling.


How to Calculate YouTube Engagement

const axios = require('axios');

const API_KEY = process.env.SOCIAVAULT_API_KEY;
const BASE_URL = 'https://api.sociavault.com';

async function checkYouTubeEngagement(channelUrl) {
  // Get channel info
  const channel = await axios.get(`${BASE_URL}/v1/scrape/youtube/channel`, {
    params: { url: channelUrl },
    headers: { 'X-API-Key': API_KEY },
  });

  const channelData = channel.data.data || channel.data;
  const subscribers = channelData.subscriberCount || 0;

  // Get recent videos
  const videos = await axios.get(`${BASE_URL}/v1/scrape/youtube/channel/videos`, {
    params: { url: channelUrl },
    headers: { 'X-API-Key': API_KEY },
  });

  const posts = videos.data.data || [];
  if (posts.length === 0) {
    console.log('No videos found');
    return;
  }

  let totalER = 0;
  let count = 0;

  posts.slice(0, 20).forEach(video => {
    const views = video.viewCount || video.views || 0;
    const likes = video.likeCount || video.likes || 0;
    const comments = video.commentCount || video.comments || 0;

    if (views > 0) {
      const er = ((likes + comments) / views) * 100;
      totalER += er;
      count++;
    }
  });

  const avgER = count > 0 ? (totalER / count).toFixed(2) : 0;

  // Determine tier
  let tier, benchmark;
  if (subscribers < 10000) { tier = 'Nano'; benchmark = 5.23; }
  else if (subscribers < 50000) { tier = 'Micro'; benchmark = 3.74; }
  else if (subscribers < 100000) { tier = 'Mid'; benchmark = 2.81; }
  else if (subscribers < 500000) { tier = 'Macro'; benchmark = 2.12; }
  else { tier = 'Mega'; benchmark = 1.41; }

  console.log(`Channel: ${channelData.name || channelUrl}`);
  console.log(`Subscribers: ${subscribers.toLocaleString()}`);
  console.log(`Avg Engagement Rate: ${avgER}% (per-view)`);
  console.log(`Tier: ${tier} (benchmark: ${benchmark}%)`);
  console.log(parseFloat(avgER) > benchmark ? '✅ Above average' : '⚠️ Below average');
}

checkYouTubeEngagement('https://www.youtube.com/@channel_name');

Cost: 2 credits


Quick Reference Card

Your TierBelow AvgAverageGoodExcellent
Nano (1K–10K)< 3.4%3.4–5.2%5.2–7.8%> 7.8%
Micro (10K–50K)< 2.5%2.5–3.7%3.7–5.4%> 5.4%
Mid (50K–100K)< 1.9%1.9–2.8%2.8–4.1%> 4.1%
Macro (100K–500K)< 1.4%1.4–2.1%2.1–3.2%> 3.2%
Mega (500K+)< 0.9%0.9–1.4%1.4–2.2%> 2.2%

Remember: these are per-view engagement rates. Not per-subscriber.


Read the Full Report

Social Media Engagement Rate Benchmarks 2026 — Full Report →


Found this helpful?

Share it with others who might benefit

Ready to Try SociaVault?

Start extracting social media data with our powerful API. No credit card required.